Tom writes:
I am a big fan of cover versions. This might be a controversial thing to say, since cover versions can somewhat divide opinions – among both musicians and fans – but it’s nonetheless true. There are those, such as the late Prince, that would argue that in no other art form is an artist so little in control of who can produce different versions of your intellectual property – if another musician pays for the appropriate mechanical licence there is generally nothing the original artist can do to stop an alternative version being performed, recorded, and distributed, even if the new version is disliked by the original composer or performer. Of course, proper acknowledgments need to be given, but beyond that, once you put music out there, any other artist can pretty much cover it any way they like without your say-so.
This can, of course, result in cover versions becoming better known than the original. For example, the late Sinéad O’Connor’s cover of Prince’s ‘Nothing Compares 2 U’ is undoubtedly better known than Prince’s own versions – the Irish woman certainly comes above the Minnesotan man in a Spotify search. Yet the debate will rage as to whether a cover version is actually better than the
original. I’d personally argue that almost any cover of a Bob Dylan song is better than the original – because while I think Dylan is an amazing songwriter I don’t think he’s a great singer, but plenty of Dylan fans would passionately disagree with me, and I suspect Dylan would too!
Yet sometimes a cover version can almost indisputably be considered superior to an original, so much so that the song somehow becomes the property of the later artist. I would suggest that one such song is the Johnny Cash version of Nine Inch Nails’ ‘Hurt’. And if any NIN fans want to disagree then I’ll simply point out that Trent Reznor himself is on record in several places as saying that it’s Cash’s song now rather than his.
Recorded for the album, American IV: The Man Comes Around, in 2002, it was the video of the song released the following year that truly captured the imagination of critics and the popular music-listening population. In it, Cash takes an industrial rock track about the writer’s struggles with heroin addiction, and turns it into a meditation on life, love, faith and mortality (the mystique and emotion of Cash’s version is rooted in part by the reality that by the end of 2003 both Cash’s wife June Carter Cash and Johnny himself had both died from medical complications). Most notably, the conversion to a religious reflection comes as Cash changes just one word from the original, moving from singing about the wearing of a crown of “shit” to instead referencing one made of thorns.
For me, Cash’s incredible cover reminds me that nothing is irredeemable in this world. To be clear, I’m not sold on the idea Reznor’s original needs redemption, yet even those who might argue it does would struggle to argue against the idea that this is precisely what Cash has managed to do. Cover versions may be controversial, but their existence enables artists to offer new possibilities, challenge presumptions, and create new ways of engaging with the transcendent.
You can still visit Johnny Cash’s website at https://www.johnnycash.com/
And you’ll find Nine Inch Nails at https://www.nin.com/